Finding the right video hosting platform isn’t just about going live; it’s about choosing a home for your content that supports growth, monetization, and community building.

The platform you pick can shape everything from how professional your streams look to how easily you can turn viewers into paying supporters.

Castr has been around long enough to earn a solid reputation in the streaming world.

It’s reliable, offers strong multistreaming tools, and includes built-in monetization options that make it a go-to for creators, schools, and organizations alike.

However, like any platform, it has its limitations, and what works for one creator may not always work for another. That’s why exploring your alternatives is essential.

In this guide, we break down eight of the best alternatives to Castr for 2025. Platforms that can help you find the right mix of features, flexibility, and revenue potential to take your video content beyond just views.

What is Castr?

Castr is essentially a Swiss-army knife for video; one platform that enables you to go live, multistream to multiple destinations, host VOD, monetize your content, and keep everything secure without juggling a stack of separate tools. 

Built by a team led by CEO Pouya Saadeghi, Castr was designed to make pro-level streaming accessible for creators, indie teams, schools, churches, and broadcasters who don’t have enterprise budgets or technical crews. 

It shines with rock-solid multistreaming, adaptive playback, and a global CDN backbone, while also incorporating extras such as cloud recording, TV playout, and ultra-low latency WebRTC for real-time interaction. 

But what makes Castr such a solid choice is the balance between power and ease. You can start simple with a stream to YouTube or Twitch, then scale up into paywalls, OTT apps, and even 24/7 channels as your audience and ambitions grow. Making it a platform that grows with you, instead of one you’ll quickly outgrow.

Castr’s Core Capabilities 

• Live Streaming:  Stream from any device or encoder with adaptive bitrate for smooth playback and ultra-low latency WebRTC for real-time interaction.
• Multistreaming: Broadcast a single live feed to 30+ platforms at once, with a Destination Manager that handles all metadata for you.
• Video Hosting (VOD): Upload, organize, and update videos while maintaining the same URL, with additional features such as chapter markers and AI-generated captions.
• Cloud Recording & Live to VOD: Automatically record streams to the cloud, then trim, clip, and repurpose them into on-demand content.
• TV Playout (Cloud Channel): Create 24/7 scheduled channels, integrate live segments, and stream them to RTMP destinations or your website.
• Monetization: Earn through paywalls, subscriptions, or ad placements, with fully branded checkout powered by Stripe.
• Analytics: Track real-time stream health and dive into viewer behavior with insights on engagement, watch time, and location.
• Security & Control: Protect content with passwords, geo-blocking, and domain locks, or distribute securely via custom HLS URLs.
• Delivery & Reliability: Rely on a multi-CDN backbone with global ingest points and 24/7 streaming support for consistent uptime.
• APIs & Developer Tools: Automate your entire workflow with APIs for live streaming, VOD, multistreaming, clipping, and custom players.
• Specialty Workflows: Use transcoding, stream pulls (SRT/RTMP/HLS/RTSP), and playlists to tailor streams and embed dynamic players.
• OTT Apps (White-Label): Launch your own branded apps across web, mobile, and TV with a centralized CMS and full subscriber data ownership.

Pricing Structure

Castr keeps things flexible with multiple plans that scale as your streaming needs grow. 

You can start with the affordable Starter plan if you’re just getting started with multistreaming, then upgrade to higher tiers for advanced features such as adaptive bitrate, custom transcoders, OTT-ready HLS URLs, and even peer-to-peer eCDN with dedicated support. 

Here’s the breakdown:

Why You Should Consider a Castr Alternative?

Castr is a strong multistreaming platform, but it isn’t without its flaws. 

For many creators and organizations, the limitations become apparent once you move beyond the basics or rely on it for day-to-day streaming. 

Here are some of the most common complaints:

Feature Restrictions on Lower Plans

• On the Starter plan, livestreams are only saved for 3 days, which can be a significant issue if someone forgets to archive them in a timely manner.
• Some useful functions, like adaptive bitrate or advanced branding, are locked behind higher-cost tiers.

Bandwidth and Storage Headaches

• Predicting bandwidth and available storage isn’t always straightforward, making it tricky to manage usage.
• Non-profits and small teams often struggle with the higher costs required to unlock additional storage or higher bitrates.

Livestream Scheduling Limitations

• You can’t schedule streams down to the minute, meaning your quota might get used up if your stream runs at times you don’t want (such as overnight for daylight-dependent events).
• Some users have had to create their own workarounds with timers to shut off feeds.

Paywall Frustrations

• Castr’s email list/paywall system recently added “bypass” passwords, but they’re auto-generated, long, and not editable.
• There’s no easy way to import/export mailing lists, and you can’t simplify passwords for easier access.

Support Challenges

• While the documentation is solid, live support during real-time streaming issues isn’t always available.
• Some users have reported delays in receiving customer service responses, although issues are eventually resolved.

Where Castr Fits (and Where It Doesn’t)

Perfect for:

• Creators and teams who want multistream, VOD, and paywalls in one place. 
• Organizations that need security controls and reliable global delivery. 
• Channels that plan to scale into 24/7 linear, OTT apps, and low-latency use cases.

Watch-outs:

• Deeper customization and advanced features are available on higher tiers.
• If you need a heavy-duty eCommerce solution (merchandise memberships/community) built in, you’ll likely pair Castr with a storefront platform.

Bottom line: Castr works best as a reliable multistream backbone, but if you need deeper community tools, built-in eCommerce, flexible monetization, or faster hands-on support, you may find a better fit with one of the alternatives below. 

Top 8 Castr Alternatives in 2025

1. Fourthwall – Best for Creators Who Want Video + eCommerce

Think of Fourthwall as your creative hub: not just a place to host videos, but a full platform designed to expand your brand and unlock new ways to monetize. 

Although not as advanced as most of the platforms on this list, Fourthwall offers a polished, no-code website that allows video creators to upload and organize 1080p videos, create Netflix-style collections, and secure content behind paywalls or membership tiers. 

What sets it apart from platforms like Castr is that video hosting isn’t siloed; it’s woven into an all-in-one platform that also includes memberships, merch, digital downloads, fan perks, and analytics. 

Whether you’re sharing premium tutorials, behind-the-scenes content, or exclusive episodes, Fourthwall makes it easy for your audience to watch seamlessly across devices and just as easy for you to get paid. 

And because it’s built for creators first, every video you upload is tied directly to the growth of your community and business, not just your view count.

💰 Pricing:

Free Plan – $0 to start + 5% fee on memberships and digital product sales

• Secure paywall, Netflix-style catalog for VOD content, mobile and TV compatible, membership analytics, and can host third-party videos, including YouTube, Vimeo, and Streamable videos

Fourthwall Pro – $19/month or $180/year; only 5% fee for membership sales

• Everything on the free plan + free .store domain, unlimited team members, and priority customer support

✅ Pros:

• Fully branded, no-code website where you own your audience data and membership info
• Combines video hosting with memberships, merch, and digital sales in one platform
• Supports premium perks like bonus videos, Discord access, private RSS feeds, polls, and exclusive merch drops
• Built-in analytics to track subscriber retention, video performance, and community growth.
• Native integrations with YouTube, TikTok, and Twitch to funnel fans directly into your ecosystem
• Flexible playback; fans can watch on desktop, mobile, or stream to TV with AirPlay or Chromecast

❌ Cons:

• Limited live streaming support compared to Castr’s robust infrastructure
• Lacks advanced enterprise-level OTT features like custom TV apps or white-label app deployment

2. Vimeo Streaming (formerly Vimeo OTT) – A Premium Alternative to Castr

Vimeo Streaming takes video hosting to the next level by empowering creators and businesses to launch their own branded streaming services without building infrastructure from scratch. 

Think of it as your own premium streaming channel. You can upload videos in stunning 4K, organize them into categories, and create polished libraries that feel like a professional streaming service. 

Beyond just video quality, Vimeo offers flexible monetization options—whether you prefer subscriptions, pay-per-view, or one-time purchases, you can mix and match models to suit your audience. 

Add live streaming, branded OTT apps across iOS, Android, Roku, Fire TV, and Apple TV, plus robust analytics and built-in marketing tools, and Vimeo becomes an end-to-end solution for creators who want to scale their video business with polish and control.

💰 Pricing:

Platform Fees:

• $1 per subscriber per month

Transaction Fees:

• 2.5% + $0.30 per subscription transaction (SVOD)
• 10% + $0.50 per pay-per-view (TVOD)

Video Upload Costs:

• $99 for up to 10 hours
• $149 for 25 hours
• $199 for 50 hours

✅ Pros:

• Stunning video playback with 4K and adaptive bitrate streaming
• Flexible monetization options: subscriptions, TVOD, PPV, or a hybrid model
• Professional content management system with playlists, categories, and bulk uploads
• White-label customization with branded OTT apps for web, mobile, and TV
• In-depth analytics on viewer behavior and engagement
• Built-in marketing toolkit for emails, promos, and subscriber retention
• Integrations with Stripe, Mailchimp, Zapier, and developer API access

❌ Cons:

• Pricing can get expensive, especially with subscriber fees and upload costs
• Limited eCommerce features compared to creator-first platforms (no merch or memberships)
• Higher-level features, such as OTT apps, often require enterprise plans
• Not as beginner-friendly for small creators; better suited for growing businesses and media companies

3. Uscreen – A Full-Scale Video Hosting & Monetization Platform

Uscreen isn’t just about streaming; it’s about turning your video library into a full-fledged business. 

Built for creators, educators, fitness coaches, and media brands, Uscreen combines professional video hosting with live streaming, community features, and a wide range of monetization models. 

You can upload HD videos, build premium video catalogs, and offer subscriptions, pay-per-view events, or rentals, all wrapped in your own branded website and native mobile/TV apps. 

What makes Uscreen a standout alternative to Castr is its focus on long-term sustainability. Beyond hosting, you get marketing automations, analytics, and fan engagement tools that help you grow recurring revenue and scale like a true media company.

💰 Pricing:

Growth Plan: $149/month + $1.99 per subscriber fee

• Unlimited bandwidth, 100 hours of video storage, 1 free live streaming hour, chat & email support, Netflix-style catalog

App Essentials Plan: $449/month + $0.99 per subscriber fee

• Everything in Growth, plus onboarding & migration support, 2 custom mobile apps, and expanded add-ons (storage, analytics, live packs)

Custom Plan: Contact sales + $0.99 per subscriber fee

• White-label branding, up to 5 TV apps, advanced analytics, API access, VIP support, and tailored enterprise-level features

✅ Pros:

• It combines video hosting, live streaming, memberships, and community in one platform
• Multiple monetization models (SVOD, TVOD, PPV, donations, and group subscriptions)
• Native branded mobile and smart TV apps for iOS, Android, Roku, Fire TV, and Apple TV
• Strong analytics dashboard for tracking subscriber growth, retention, and revenue
• Marketing automations (email broadcasts, promo codes, gift cards, push notifications)

❌ Cons:

• Pricing is high compared to simpler creator-first tools like Fourthwall or Castr
• Subscriber fees add up quickly as your audience grows
• Live streaming features don’t yet support advanced setups, such as multi-guest capture
• Limited ability to embed hosted videos outside the platform

4. Restream — Go Live Everywhere, Build Revenue Anywhere

Restream is a browser-based studio and multistreaming engine that broadcasts one feed live to 30+ platforms simultaneously, so your content (and calls-to-action) can reach fans wherever they are. 

Beyond going live, you can schedule pre-recorded videos as “live,” invite on-screen guests, switch layouts, brand your show, and aggregate chat from every platform in a single window. 

While it isn’t a full OTT/VOD library like Castr, Restream shines for reach-first creators looking to pair live distribution with built-in overlays, QR codes, and a web player (on higher tiers) to funnel viewers to their storefronts, memberships, or monetization tools. 

And with real-time, cross-platform analytics that help you see what’s working, Restream allows you to double down on the channels and formats that actually convert, giving you a clear path to grow your audience faster and maximize revenue without wasting time on streams that don’t deliver.

💰 Pricing:

Free — $0/month

• Multistream to 2 channels, unified chat, Studio watermark, basic analytics; local recordings (rolling out)

Standard — $19/month (or $16/month billed annually) 

• 3 channels, no Studio watermark, unlimited cloud recordings, guest channels; Studio with up to 10 on-screen participants; Upload & Stream up to 30-min/500MB per video. (Optional: AI Clips +$19/mo for 50 clips)

Professional — $49/month (or $39/month annually)

• 5 channels, custom RTMP channels, team workspaces (from 2 seats), split audio/video downloads, 1080p Studio, stream looping, Upload & Stream up to 60-min/2GB. (Optional: AI Clips +$29/mo for 100 clips)

Business — $239/month (or $199/month annually)

• 8 channels, priority support, SRT ingest, co-producer mode, 30-day recording storage, web player (1,000 viewers), Upload & Stream up to 2-hr/5GB. (Optional: AI Clips +$59/mo for 250 clips)

Enterprise — Custom: 

• Higher limits, SLAs, tailored workflows, and support

✅ Pros:

• Multistreams over 30 platforms from one dashboard
• Their studio runs in the browser and integrates cleanly with OBS, vMix, Ecamm, Zoom, and more
• Unified chat, on-screen comments, CTAs/QR codes, guest invites, and collab channels
• Schedule polished videos to premiere as live and loop playlists for always-on channels
• Cross-platform performance in one place to guide where you invest time and ad dollars
• Free tier to start; scalable plans as your channel mix grows

❌ Cons:

• Limited long-term storage and library management versus Castr-style VOD hosting
• Watermarks and storage caps will be in effect until you upgrade
• No native subscription paywall; monetization leans on social features or your own site
• Facebook Pages, higher recording limits, SRT ingest, and web player require higher tiers

5. StreamYard – Best for Easy Live Streaming

StreamYard is one of the easiest ways to go live and record professional-quality content straight from your browser; no downloads, no complicated setups. 

You can multistream to up to eight destinations simultaneously, providing your viewers with fully branded shows, each equipped with custom overlays, logos, and backgrounds. 

Businesses use it not just for social streaming but also for webinars and podcasts thanks to features like backstage “Greenroom” spaces, team roles, and enterprise-grade stability. 

However, unlike most platforms on this list, StreamYard doesn’t offer any built-in monetization features, such as subscriptions or paywalls. Nevertheless, it integrates seamlessly with platforms that do, making it a polished choice for creators and companies focused on audience engagement and reach.

💰 Pricing: 

Free Plan – $0/month

• Stream to 2 destinations with up to 6 on-screen participants, 2 hours of local recording, and StreamYard branding.

Core Plan – $44.99/month

• Full HD (1080p) streaming to 3 destinations, up to 10 on-screen participants, unlimited streaming & recording, 50 hours of permanent storage, custom branding (logos, overlays, video clips, backgrounds), pre-recorded streams (2 hrs), and custom RTMP

Advanced Plan – $88.99/month

• Everything in Core, plus 4K local recording, streaming to 8 destinations, 15 backstage participants, 4-hour pre-recorded streams, On-Air webinars, extra cameras, custom fonts, and reusable studios

Teams Plan – $298.99/month

• Advanced features plus multi-seat team management, 8+ destinations, 8-hour pre-recorded streams, private team spaces, and advanced collaboration tools

Business Plan – Custom pricing

• Enterprise support with centralized invoicing, white-labeling, advanced storage, priority customer service, and 99.9% SLA uptime guarantees

✅ Pros:

• Simple, browser-based setup; no downloads required
• Multistreaming to up to 8 destinations, including YouTube, LinkedIn, Twitch, and more.
• Branded, professional streams with logos, overlays, banners, backgrounds, and custom layouts
• Greenroom waiting area and private guest messaging for smoother shows
• Studio-quality audio/video recording, with 1080p or 4K (Advanced plan)
• Excellent for business webinars, podcasts, and company-wide events
• Strong enterprise features: Single Sign-On, invoicing, role-based access, and uptime guarantees
• Responsive customer support with prioritized email queues and problem-solving teams

❌ Cons:

• No built-in monetization (no native memberships, subscriptions, or paywalls)
• Their free plan includes StreamYard branding and is limited to specific destinations
• Storage limits on lower tiers (50 hours on Core)
• Lacks advanced in-studio editing or OTT-style VOD hosting features
• More expensive than creator-first alternatives like Restream or Fourthwall for smaller creators

6. Dacast – Best for Live Events & Pay-Per-View

If you’re streaming a big event, whether it’s a sold-out concert, a global conference, or Friday Night Lights, Dacast is built to ensure your broadcast not only looks professional but also pays for itself. 

Unlike Castr, which focuses more on multistreaming, Dacast shines with its integrated paywall that lets you run subscriptions, charge pay-per-view, or even monetize with ads right inside your player. 

Beyond monetization, it delivers enterprise-level reliability with a white-label, fully branded player, global CDN delivery, VOD hosting, and direct Zoom integration for hybrid events. 

Add in real-time analytics, advanced library management, and developer APIs, and you’ve got a streaming platform that’s tailor-made for professionals who need both reach and revenue.

💰 Pricing:

Starter – $39/month (billed annually)

• 2.4 TB bandwidth/year, 500 GB storage, HD streaming, unlimited concurrent viewers, live & VOD hosting, simulcasting, analytics, and 24/7 support

Event – $63/month (billed annually)

• Everything in Starter plus 6 TB upfront bandwidth, live stream monitoring, China delivery, multi-CDN, countdown timers, paywall integration, and pre/mid/post-roll advertising

Scale (Most Popular) – $165/month (billed annually)

• Includes 24 TB/year, 2 TB storage, unlimited channels, VOD chapter markers, DRM/AES protection, advanced library management, team collaboration, player CNAME, and phone support

Custom – Contact sales

• Tailored plans with higher bandwidth/storage, M3U8 links for OTT distribution, custom SLAs, large-scale event support, migrations/integrations, and up to 5+ team members

✅ Pros:

• Built-in paywall with PPV, SVOD, and AVOD monetization models
• White-label, customizable player for full branding control
• Excellent live streaming performance with global CDN coverage
• Integrates with Zoom for hybrid events and webinars
• Detailed analytics and developer-friendly APIs
• Unlimited concurrent viewers across all plans
• 24/7 customer support and strong enterprise reliability

❌ Cons:

• Steeper learning curve compared to creator-first tools like StreamYard or Restream
• No built-in DRM protection on lower-tier plans (premium only)
• Bandwidth and storage limits can get pricey for high-volume use
• Interface is less beginner-friendly compared to other multistreaming platforms

7. Wowza – Best for Low-Latency Live Streaming

When you need streaming that’s built for scale, reliability, and real-time delivery, Wowza is one of the strongest alternatives to Castr on the market. 

Trusted by broadcasters, sports organizations, and enterprise teams, Wowza is engineered for ultra-low latency HLS and adaptive bitrate streaming, ensuring smooth, high-quality playback across all devices, especially under heavy traffic. 

Its flexibility is what sets it apart: you can build fully customized workflows using advanced APIs, developer SDKs, SecureToken playback protection, CSS skinning, and plugins, making it a favorite for businesses that need more than just basic video hosting. 

Wowza also supports 360° video, closed captions (SCTE standards), interactive broadcasts, and white-label OTT delivery, making it ideal for mission-critical use cases like virtual conferences, live sports, or large-scale hybrid events. 

While it doesn’t offer built-in monetization like Castr’s paywalls or Fourthwall’s membership tiers, Wowza integrates easily with payment gateways and third-party tools, giving enterprises full control over how they monetize content.

💰 Pricing:

Pay As You Go – $0 base fee, pay only for usage

• $2.50 per streaming hour + $0.10 per viewer hour; best for ongoing or fluctuating streaming needs

One Month of Streaming – $149 one-time purchase

• 15 streaming hours, 500 viewing hours, storage billed separately

Streaming Cloud Monthly Plans – Starting at $25/month

• Includes set streaming hours, transcoding, adaptive bitrate delivery, and 24/7 support

Streaming Engine (Self-Hosted) – From $175/month (billed annually)

• Full on-premise control for live and VOD workflows, with advanced APIs and DRM options

Enterprise – Custom pricing

• Tailored for OTT apps, real-time interactive streaming at scale, premium SLAs, and large audience delivery

✅ Pros:

• Ultra-low latency streaming with adaptive bitrate for smooth global playback
• Trusted by major broadcasters, sports leagues, and enterprises for mission-critical events
• Developer-first platform with APIs, SDKs, plugins, and SecureToken authentication
• Supports 360° video, interactive features, closed captions, and white-label players
• End-to-end analytics and a robust CMS for managing live and VOD content
• Highly scalable with global CDN delivery and SOC 2, Type 2 certified security

❌ Cons:

• Steeper learning curve compared to creator-first platforms like Castr or StreamYard
• Limited native monetization; requires third-party integrations for paywalls or subscriptions
• Pricing can get expensive at scale, especially for high viewer hours
• More technical setup required than plug-and-play multistreaming tools

8. Muvi – Best for Streaming Content at Scale

Looking to build a fully branded streaming service without stitching together plugins? Enter Muvi!

This platform allows you to host unlimited video and audio content, stream live, and deliver secure playback across web, mobile, and TV apps, all from a single dashboard. 

Its hosting stack is serious: rapid transcoding, built-in CDN, adaptive bitrate, multi-DRM, dynamic watermarking, geo/domain controls, and a customizable HTML5 player. 

Muvi’s CMS handles massive libraries (bulk upload, scheduling, metadata), while monetization covers SVOD, TVOD/PPV, AVOD, coupons/bundles, multi-currency, carrier billing, and dozens of gateways. 

Layer in AI subtitles/translations, recommendations, analytics, partner portals, and SDKs, and you’ve got a white-label OTT platform that scales from first launch to enterprise.

💰Pricing:

Standard — $399/mo (billed annually + infra fees)

• White-label site + one app, unlimited content/users, ~1k concurrents, HD/ABR, playlists/categories, basic analytics, SVOD/TVOD/AVOD, DRM, built-in CDN, player customization, APIs/webhooks, 7 templates, 99.9% uptime

Professional — $1,499/mo (billed annually + infra fees)

• Everything in Standard plus 5k concurrents, desktop & TV apps, 4K, live chat/polls, bulk upload/FTP sync, AI subtitles, advanced security (watermarking/geo/domain), vouchers/coupons, UGC, MRSS, marketing & Zapier integrations, 3 admin seats

Enterprise — $3,900/mo (billed annually + infra fees)

• Everything in Professional plus 50k concurrents, dedicated server & staging, per-title/lossless encoding, AI recommendations/translations, custom analytics, RBAC/SSO, content partner portal, 10 admin seats, 99.99% uptime

Ultimate — Custom (from ~$10,000/mo + infra fees)

• 50k+ concurrents, custom CDN/storage, disaster recovery, forensic watermarking, audit logs, compliance support (e.g., SOC II/GDPR/HIPAA), expert consulting, 20 admin seats, 99.999% uptime

✅ Pros: 

• End-to-end white-label OTT with native web/mobile/TV apps and deep branding control
• Enterprise-grade hosting: fast transcoding, CDN, ABR, multi-DRM, watermarking, geo/domain restrictions
• Flexible monetization out of the box (SVOD/TVOD/AVOD), coupons, bundles, multi-currency, and carrier billing
• Powerful CMS, AI subtitles/translations and recommendations, robust analytics, partner portal, SDKs/APIs
• Strong security posture and high-uptime SLAs

❌ Cons:

• Higher entry price and separate infrastructure fees; extra apps can raise the total cost
• More setup complexity and learning curve than creator-first tools
• Concurrency limits on lower tiers; some premium capabilities require upper plans
• Overkill if you only need basic multistreaming or a simple video paywall

What to Look for in a Video Hosting Platform

As you can tell, not all streaming platforms are built the same, and the best Castr alternative really depends on where you are in your creator or business journey.

And with so many options on the market, narrowing it down to a platform that aligns with your goals will save you time, money, and frustration. 

Here are some key factors to consider, along with examples of platforms that shine in each area:

Pricing & Scalability 

If you’re just getting started, a free or low-cost option like Restream or StreamYard makes it easy to test the waters. 

But if you’re planning for long-term growth, platforms like Uscreen and Muvi are designed to scale with you, offering advanced infrastructure and enterprise-level features as your audience expands.

Monetization Options 

Castr is flexible, but some alternatives go even further. Dacast and Uscreen both feature built-in paywalls with multiple monetization models, including subscription video on demand (SVOD), pay-per-view (PPV), and ad-supported video on demand (AVOD). 

Fourthwall stands out for solo creators by allowing you to bundle video hosting with memberships, merchandise, and digital downloads, transforming your channel into a full-fledged creator business. 

Meanwhile, Wistia focuses on lead generation and marketing ROI, while Muvi combines nearly every monetization model into one, including ads, subscriptions, and direct carrier billing.

Customization & Branding 

Want your own branded experience instead of looking like another channel on someone else’s platform? 

Vimeo Streaming and Muvi offer white-label players, branded TV and mobile apps, and full control over your streaming environment. 

Fourthwall provides creators with a fully branded site where your video content is showcased alongside your merchandise and membership offerings. 

For businesses that require deep technical flexibility, Wowza offers developer-friendly APIs and custom workflows, enabling you to build a streaming setup tailored to your exact needs.

Analytics & Engagement 

Data is everything when it comes to growing your viewership. 

Wistia is known for its marketing-focused analytics, including heatmaps and engagement graphs, while Restream provides cross-platform analytics, enabling you to see where your streams perform best. 

Uscreen takes it further with detailed revenue and subscriber reporting, helping you refine not just your content but your monetization strategy.

Ease of Use

Some platforms are made for beginners, while others are built for enterprise teams. 

StreamYard and Restream Studio keep things simple with browser-based streaming and drag-and-drop customization, while Wowza and Vimeo Streaming cater to technical users who need low-latency workflows and advanced API integrations. 

Fourthwall sits in the middle, offering creators an intuitive, all-in-one dashboard that's powerful enough to monetize in multiple ways, but still beginner-friendly compared to enterprise-level platforms. 

For More Than Video-Hosting—Choose Fourthwall!

While Castr is a dependable option for multistreaming and video hosting, most creators require more than just a platform to upload videos—they need a comprehensive solution that can power their entire business. 

That’s where Fourthwall comes in. With built-in video hosting, memberships, digital downloads, and merch all under one roof, Fourthwall makes it easy to monetize in multiple ways without relying on third-party tools. 

You get a free storefront, creator-first features, and the ability to grow your brand globally—all with no monthly fees unless you choose to upgrade to Pro. 

If you’re serious about turning your content into income, Fourthwall isn’t just an alternative to Castr; it’s the platform designed to help you build a business that lasts.